Inventora vs. Ardent Seller: A 2026 Head-to-Head for Multi-Channel Makers

Comparison shopping for inventory software is like trying on running shoes by jogging the length of the store. The tools all walk fine. The interesting differences show up around mile three, when the seam under the arch starts rubbing or the cushioning under the heel gives out. The difference between Inventora and Ardent Seller is similar — both will track inventory, both will cost recipes, both will calculate COGS, both will sync orders. The seams that matter live a level deeper, in pricing structure, in which features sit behind which tier, in what each tool will and will not do at compliance time, and in what each one quietly assumes about how big the seller's catalog is going to get.

This is a long-form comparison written for the seller who has both browser tabs open and would like an opinionated walk-through before committing. The data behind the feature claims lives on the Ardent Seller vs Inventora comparison page, which is reviewed and dated; this post is the conversational version of that data with the tradeoffs spelled out.

The short version:

• Pricing: Inventora is $23–$120/month monthly-billed ($19–$99/month annual-billed), with no free plan — a 7-day trial instead. Ardent Seller is $0–$89/month flat with unlimited inventory items on every plan, plus an optional pay-as-you-go tier.
• Material limits: Inventora caps materials and variants by plan (500 → 2,000 → 10,000). Ardent Seller has no material cap on any plan, including free.
• Recipe costing & lot tracking: Both have them. Inventora includes lot tracking on all three of its paid plans, from Starter ($23/mo, or $19/mo annual-billed). Ardent Seller includes recipe costing and batch/lot tracking on every plan including free.
• Equipment depreciation: Ardent Seller has it (straight-line schedule with placed-in-service date and residual value). Inventora does not currently offer it.
• Food & cosmetic labeling: Ardent Seller generates FDA nutrition facts panels, tracks the major allergens automatically, and ships a built-in food/ingredient database. Inventora has none of these.
• Multi-channel integrations: Inventora supports a wider list of native marketplaces today, gated by an integration count per plan. Ardent Seller has native Etsy today, with Shopify on the active roadmap and a unified marketplace hub that new connectors will land into.
• AI invoice import: Both have it. Inventora includes it on all three paid plans, from Starter ($23/mo, or $19/mo annual-billed); Ardent Seller includes it on every plan — including the free tier — with a monthly included allowance (3 on Free, scaling to 200 on Workshop) and 1 credit per import on pay-as-you-go.
• Audit trail: Ardent Seller has a before/after audit log with user attribution on every plan. Inventora has a History log with undo, without documented before/after comparison.
• Who Inventora still wins for: sellers running three or more marketplaces today who need every native connector right now; teams already fluent on Inventora who would pay the migration cost twice over.
• Who Ardent Seller wins for: anyone bumping up against Inventora's material cap; food sellers, soap and body-care makers, and anyone whose label a regulator could read; sellers tracking depreciable equipment; makers who want every feature available on the free tier they sign up for.

The five questions this comparison actually answers

Most software comparisons make readers wade through fifteen feature checkboxes that all blur together. The decision is usually simpler than that. Five questions decide which of these two tools fits a given maker business; the rest is detail.

1. How big is the materials catalog, today and in a year? Inventora has no free plan, so the question starts at Starter: if the answer is over 500 materials or 500 product variants, the $23/mo Starter ($19/mo annual-billed) is off the table. If the answer is over 2,000, the $48/mo Business plan is off too. Ardent Seller has no material cap on any plan including free, so this question never lands.
2. Does the business need AI invoice import? Both tools ship it now, so it stopped being a tiebreaker on its own. The difference is where it sits: Inventora includes invoice import on every paid plan from Starter ($23/mo monthly-billed), while Ardent Seller includes it on every plan — including the free tier — with a monthly included allowance and pay-as-you-go credits beyond it.
3. Is the seller running food, soap, cosmetics, herbal, or any product a regulator could read the label on? If yes, the comparison tilts hard toward Ardent Seller. FDA nutrition facts, automatic allergen inheritance, and the built-in food database are native; Inventora does none of these.
4. Are there depreciable assets to track — a kiln, a roaster, a mixer, a printer, a CNC? If yes, Ardent Seller has built-in equipment depreciation (straight-line, placed-in-service date, useful-life-in-years, residual value). Inventora does not.
5. Are three or more marketplaces live in the operation today? If yes, and the seller cannot bridge with a CSV during the period before Shopify ships on Ardent Seller, Inventora has the broader native connector list right now. If only Etsy is live — or if Etsy plus one CSV-bridgeable channel is the realistic shape — Ardent Seller is in play.

The rest of this post walks each of these questions one tradeoff at a time.

Round 1: Pricing structure

The most visible difference is also the most consequential. Inventora prices on a three-tier paid model with material caps that scale linearly with cost. Ardent Seller prices flat: every plan includes every feature, and the price scales with the volume the seller is doing.

Inventora: tiered, with material caps that bite

Pros:

• A 7-day free trial on any paid plan, so a seller can test Starter, Business, or Growth before paying.
• Annual billing is meaningfully cheaper than monthly billing — $19/$39/$99 annual-billed vs $23/$48/$120 monthly-billed at Starter/Business/Growth.
• AI invoice import, lot traceability, and unlimited sales and production cards are included from the entry Starter plan.
• Tiered features create a defined upgrade path as the business grows.

Cons:

• No free plan. The Hobby tier Inventora listed earlier in 2026 (50 materials, 10 sales/month) is gone from the pricing page; after the 7-day trial, every account pays at least $23/mo, or $19/mo billed annually.
• Material cap is the real ceiling, not the price. A seller with 600 raw materials and 200 finished variants is over Starter's 500-material cap and into the $48/mo Business plan whether or not they need any other Business feature.
• Wholesale sales tracking, QR code labels, and automatic supplier reorders start at Business ($48/mo, or $39/mo annual-billed).
• The pricing page no longer names the plan that includes API access, which Inventora's April 2026 pricing page placed on Growth — worth confirming with Inventora before building on it.

Best for: sellers who fit comfortably under one of the material caps and prefer Inventora's longer-established AI invoice scanner.

Ardent Seller: flat-rate plus PAYG, no material cap

Pros:

• Free forever plan ($0/month) with the same feature set as the paid tiers — capped at 50 transactions per month, 2 users, 2 locations, 200 MB of storage, but unlimited materials, recipes, products, variants, and SKUs.
• Paid tiers scale linearly: $19, $49, $89/month for Maker, Artisan, Workshop. Every feature on every tier. Transactions per month included scale 50 → 150 → 500 → 1,500.
• Pay-as-you-go option ($1 per credit, 20 free credits/month) for seasonal sellers who do not want a monthly subscription.
• Annual billing saves "2+ months free" on every paid tier.

Cons:

• Newer product than Inventora, which means a shorter track record on edge cases.
• AI invoice import ships with a monthly included allowance rather than unlimited use — 3 imports/month on the free plan, scaling to 200 on Workshop, with pay-as-you-go credits beyond — so a free-tier seller with heavy invoice volume will feel that cap.
• The free plan's 50-transaction cap is real, and a high-volume hobbyist will hit it during a good month.

Best for: sellers with a real catalog who do not want a per-SKU material cap, sellers in compliance-driven categories, sellers tracking depreciable equipment, and anyone who wants every feature available on the tier they sign up for.

Pricing verdict. The pricing models are different shapes, not different sizes. Inventora prices on materials and integrations; Ardent Seller prices on transactions. Which shape fits depends on what the operation actually looks like. A seller with 30 SKUs running 500 transactions/month pays $19/mo or $23/mo on Inventora's Starter plan (whichever billing they pick) and $49/mo on Ardent Seller's Artisan plan — Inventora wins. A seller with 800 materials and 100 transactions/month pays $39/mo or $48/mo on Inventora's Business plan and $19/mo on Ardent Seller's Maker plan — Ardent Seller wins. A seller just starting out with a small catalog and a few dozen sales a month pays $0 on Ardent Seller's free plan and at least $19/mo on Inventora, which no longer has a free tier. Run the numbers on the actual operation, not on the headline price.

Round 2: Material limits

Tucked inside Inventora's pricing is a structural feature most comparison posts skim past: the material cap is not just an entry-tier marketing artifact. It is on every paid tier, all the way up to Growth.

Inventora counts materials and product variants against two separate caps of the same size — a raw ingredient or a packaging component is a material; every finished SKU and each of its variants counts toward the variant cap. A jewelry maker tracking 20 metals and 200 gemstone variants is at 220 materials before adding a single packaging input. A soap maker with 40 fragrance variants on a base recipe is at 40 + the base + the colorants + the molds + the labels — call it 80. The $19 tier covers most of year one. The $39 tier covers most operations that have not yet started adding seasonal SKUs in earnest. The $99 tier is where mid-sized maker businesses live, and even there 10,000 is a real number that some businesses bump up against during seasonal scaling.

Ardent Seller does not have this dimension at all. The free plan caps transactions per month (50), users (2), locations (2), and storage (200 MB) — not the catalog. A seller with 5,000 SKUs can run them on the free plan if their order volume fits inside 50/month.

The shape of the constraint matters because operations grow asymmetrically. A seller who adds a new product line typically adds many SKUs at once (a new fragrance line adds 12 scents × 3 sizes × 2 label variants = 72 materials), but order volume scales more gradually. Inventora's model penalizes the catalog growth and rewards the slow-volume hobbyist; Ardent Seller's model rewards the catalog growth and asks the high-volume seller to pay.

Round 3: Recipe costing and lot tracking

Both tools cost recipes. This is the feature that separates dedicated maker inventory software from generic asset trackers, and it is the reason most sellers are reading this comparison in the first place.

Inventora: recipe costing and lot tracking on every plan, but no free plan

Inventora has built recipe costing for the maker audience from the start. Components, sub-recipes, packaging materials as recipe inputs, and cost rollups when raw material prices change are all in the product.

Pros:

• Polished, longstanding feature set with a meaningful track record in the soap and candle communities.
• Lot tracking is included on every paid plan starting at $19/mo annual-billed ($23/mo monthly-billed) — a noticeable advantage over Craftybase, which gates lot tracking to its $99/mo tier.
• Production cards model the run from start to finish.

Cons:

• There is no free way in: lot tracking and unlimited production cards come with the $23/mo Starter plan ($19/mo annual-billed) once the 7-day trial ends.
• The material cap (500 on Starter) bites recipe costing as much as it bites raw materials — every ingredient behind every recipe is a material counted against it.

Ardent Seller: included on every plan including free

Ardent Seller costs a recipe from two inputs: ingredient lines and step labor. The ingredient lines can be raw materials, packaging, or sub-assemblies (a soap maker's wax blend, an herbalist's tincture base) — anything tracked as inventory can be added to a recipe and contribute to the rolled-up cost. Step labor is time-based and tied to the procedure's steps. Cost rollups happen automatically when an underlying ingredient's cost changes — no formula edits, no spreadsheet rebuild. Batch and lot numbers link purchases to production to sales, and the one-click recall report identifies every affected product and customer in seconds. For the broader conceptual framework of how to think about the full cost stack, the Recipe Costing 101 primer is the longer treatment.

Pros:

• Available on the free tier — recipe costing, lot tracking, and sub-assemblies, no upgrade required.
• Cost rollups are automatic when component prices change.
• Sub-assemblies let reusable bases (a soap maker's wax blend, an herbalist's tincture base) be costed once and reused across the line — no material-cap penalty for the structure.

Cons:

• Newer product than Inventora, which means a shorter track record on multi-recipe formulator workflows specifically. A soap maker with 50+ fragrance variants on a base will not find more in Ardent Seller than in Inventora — they will find roughly the same depth in a less seasoned UI.

Recipe verdict. Both products do the work. The difference is the gate: Inventora has no free tier, so lot tracking and unlimited production cards start at its $23/mo Starter plan ($19/mo annual-billed); Ardent Seller puts them in the free tier. For a seller deciding whether to pay for lot tracking, the free Ardent Seller plan is a useful sanity check before signing up.

Round 4: Equipment depreciation

This is the cleanest "Ardent Seller wins" round in the comparison, and it matters because of what it touches: tax time.

Inventora: not a feature

Inventora has no dedicated equipment category, no depreciation schedule, no placed-in-service date, no useful-life-in-years field, no residual-value tracking. Equipment for a maker on Inventora lives in a spreadsheet next to the inventory tool, or in the accountant's file, or in the tax preparer's working papers — but not in the inventory software.

Ardent Seller: built in

Ardent Seller treats equipment as a distinct inventory category. Each equipment item gets:

• An acquisition cost.
• A placed-in-service date.
• A useful-life-in-years value.
• A residual value (what the asset is worth at the end of useful life).
• A straight-line depreciation schedule generated from the four above.

The output is a depreciation schedule the seller can hand to a CPA at tax time — useful as a recordkeeping companion to the IRS Schedule C and Form 4562 treatment of business assets. The Equipment Depreciation for Small Makers post is the longer treatment of how the math works and why it matters.

Why this matters in 2026. Section 179 expensing and bonus depreciation rules continue to evolve, and the federal recordkeeping requirement for depreciable property is unchanged: a basis figure, a placed-in-service date, a method, a useful life, and a yearly depreciation amount. Inventory software that does not produce any of those leaves the work to the spreadsheet or the accountant. For a seller with a kiln, a commercial mixer, an espresso roaster, a 3D printer, or a CNC, having the schedule sitting next to the recipe data — instead of in a different system — is one less reconciliation at tax time.

Round 5: Food and cosmetic compliance

This is the round most maker comparison posts skip past, because both tools are sold as "for makers" and the assumption is that "for makers" includes the makers who put food and skincare and herbal products into the world. Inventora does not.

Inventora: no native compliance work

Inventora's documentation is explicit: no nutrition facts panel generation, no allergen tracking, no cottage food disclosure label generator, no built-in food/ingredient database. Food businesses on Inventora track allergens manually and generate labels with a separate tool.

Ardent Seller: native compliance for food and body-care sellers

Ardent Seller ships:

• FDA-compliant nutrition facts panels. Per-serving calculations; updates automatically when recipes change; export for printing.
• Allergen tracking. Tracks the major federal allergens (milk, eggs, fish, shellfish, tree nuts, peanuts, wheat, soy, sesame) and automatically inherits them from ingredients through recipes to finished goods.
• Built-in food database. Thousands of searchable food ingredients with nutrition data, common allergens, and density values for accurate unit conversions.
• Batch-level expiration dates. Cottage food laws and FDA shelf-stable rules both lean on lot-level expiration tracking, and this is built in.
• State-aware cottage food disclosure labels (live for all 50 states plus DC). The label generator pulls the seller's state-mandated verbatim disclosure text, the right minimum font size, the operator name and address, the ingredient list sorted by weight, allergens, net weight, and lot codes — in one click.

For an at-home baker, a hot sauce maker, a soap maker building Drug Facts panels under the new MoCRA framework, a body-care formulator working with IFRA-restricted fragrances, or an herbalist watching the FDA dietary supplement boundary, the compliance work is built into the same tool that costs the recipe. The work that happens in two systems on Inventora happens in one on Ardent Seller. The Hot Sauce Compliance: pH Testing and Acidified Foods and Pet Treat Packaging, Labeling, and Cost Tracking posts are the longer treatments of what this looks like in practice.

Round 6: Multi-channel integrations

This is the round where the comparison flips. Inventora has more channels live today than Ardent Seller does.

Inventora: more native channels, gated by integration count

Inventora's marketplace integration list — Shopify, Etsy, WooCommerce, Square, Wix, and Squarespace — is broader than Ardent Seller's today. The gate is an integration-count cap that scales with the tier: 2 integrations on Starter, 3 on Business, up to 5 on Growth. A seller running Etsy plus Shopify plus Square hits 3 integrations and is on Business or Growth.

Ardent Seller: Etsy native today; Shopify on the active roadmap

Etsy is live on Ardent Seller on every plan including free. The integration uses OAuth 2.0 with PKCE, encrypts tokens at rest with AES-256-GCM, imports orders with line items, imports transaction fees and processing fees and shipping costs as separate ledger lines (so reported margins reflect take-home, not gross), and pushes inventory back to Etsy on every stock movement to prevent overselling.

Shopify is on the active roadmap and will land into the same unified marketplace hub at /settings/integrations — no separate dashboards to learn. Square POS is planned, and Faire, Squarespace, Amazon Handmade, WooCommerce, and Wix are in the "considering" column.

The honest tradeoff. For an Etsy-only seller, the comparison is even on integrations and the rest of the post decides. For a seller running Etsy plus one other channel they can bridge with a monthly CSV import for the rest of 2026, the post is also still in play. For a seller running Etsy plus Shopify plus Square as core production channels today — and unwilling to bridge any of them by CSV — Inventora is the more complete answer right now, and the right call is to wait for Ardent Seller's Shopify connector to ship before switching, or to pay the Shopify-gap-CSV-tax for the period in between.

Round 7: AI invoice import

Both tools ship AI-assisted invoice import; the difference is which plans it reaches and how far each one takes the extraction.

Inventora: AI invoice import on every paid plan

Inventora's AI-powered invoice import accepts PDF or photo and creates pre-populated supply orders for review — a real time-saver for sellers who buy from many vendors and would otherwise type the line items. Inventora's pricing page now includes it on all three paid plans, starting with Starter at $23/mo (monthly-billed) or $19/mo (annual-billed); with no free plan, the 7-day trial is the only way to use it without paying.

Ardent Seller: AI invoice import on every plan, including free

Ardent Seller ships AI-assisted invoice import too, and puts it on every plan instead of behind a mid-tier gate. Upload a PDF or a phone photo of a supplier invoice and the AI drafts the purchase: the vendor is matched to your existing vendors, each line is matched to your inventory by SKU, barcode, or name (creating new records where needed), quantities and unit costs are filled in, and order-level shipping and tax are spread across the lines into true landed cost. Nothing auto-commits — every import is an editable draft with the original invoice attached to the resulting purchase, and the whole feature can be switched off in Account Preferences.

The billing model is the real contrast. Instead of a tier gate, imports come as a monthly included allowance — 3/month on the free plan, then 25 / 75 / 200 on Maker / Artisan / Workshop — with pay-as-you-go accounts paying 1 credit per import. A free-tier Ardent seller gets AI invoice import that Inventora only offers on a paid plan.

The honest read. Both tools solve the same manual-entry pain now. Inventora's has the longer track record; Ardent Seller's reaches further down the price ladder (free vs a $19–$23/mo paid plan) and goes a step past a pre-populated order by matching each line to your inventory and allocating landed cost. If invoice import is the deciding feature, the question is no longer "who has it" but "do you want it on the free tier with inventory matching, or on a more established product behind a paid plan."

Round 8: Audit trail and the rest of the connective tissue

Three smaller features deserve a quick callout because they aggregate into the daily feel of using the tool.

Audit trail

• Inventora: a History page logs changes to materials and products (with an Undo), and production history names the team member behind each batch, but the documentation does not surface a structured before/after comparison on every change.
• Ardent Seller: every change logged with username, timestamp, and before/after comparison; searchable audit history by user, date, or table; cannot be deleted or modified; 14-day retention free, extendable to 30/60/unlimited via credits.

For a seller who has ever had to figure out who changed a recipe ingredient or when an inventory count was adjusted — and for any seller running a multi-person operation — this gap is felt weekly.

Authentication

• Inventora: email/password login only. No social login, no magic links, no documented MFA.
• Ardent Seller: Google and Facebook social login, magic links via email, and MFA under consideration. No password to remember on day one.

Multi-location

• Inventora: 1 full production location on Starter and Business, with Business adding 2 sales locations (Inventora describes them as retail stores, consignment locations, and distribution centers); 3 full production locations plus 3 sales locations on Growth. Stock can be transferred between locations.
• Ardent Seller: 2 locations on Free and Maker, 3 on Artisan, 5 on Workshop, additional locations on PAYG. Inter-location transfers built in with a documented transfer history.

For a seller running a workshop, a market booth, and a consignment shelf, both tools can move stock between the three places; the difference is what it costs to have three places at all — Business ($48/mo) at minimum on Inventora, Artisan ($49/mo) on Ardent Seller, with two locations already on Ardent's free plan. The Multi-Location Inventory Tracking post is the longer treatment.

Transaction fee tracking

• Inventora: no transaction fee tracking or payment method fee calculations documented.
• Ardent Seller: configurable fixed and percentage-based fees per payment method, plus automatic per-event ledger lines for Etsy transaction, processing, and shipping fees — so the reported margin is the seller's take-home, not the gross.

For an Etsy seller comparing margins across SKUs, this single feature explains why one product looks profitable in a generic inventory tool and unprofitable in Ardent Seller — the fees were always there, the inventory tool was just hiding them.

Where Inventora still wins

The honest comparison list:

• Native multi-marketplace breadth. A seller running three or more marketplaces as production channels today, unwilling to bridge any by CSV, gets a more complete answer from Inventora until Ardent Seller's Shopify connector ships.
• Track record in the soap and candle communities. Inventora has been in this space longer with a meaningful base of working maker accounts; the tool is well-debugged for those specific workflows.
• Team already fluent on Inventora. A two- or three-person operation that has trained on Inventora and is moving cleanly through their week on it should not switch on the basis of a comparison post. The migration cost is real, the disruption is real, and the comparison post is one input among many.

Where Ardent Seller wins

The honest comparison list:

• No material cap on any plan. The constraint that quietly forces Inventora upgrades does not exist.
• Free tier with all features. Recipe costing, lot tracking, multi-location, audit trail, FDA nutrition labels — all on the $0/month plan, where Inventora now offers only a 7-day trial. The 50 transactions/month cap is the real constraint, not the feature set.
• AI invoice import on every plan. Including the free tier, with each line matched to inventory and shipping/tax allocated into landed cost — Inventora only offers invoice import on a paid plan.
• Equipment depreciation. A real feature with real tax-recordkeeping value that Inventora does not match.
• Food and cosmetic compliance built in. Nutrition facts, allergens, food database, batch expirations — native, not bolted on.
• Before/after audit trail with user attribution. On every plan, including free.
• Etsy transaction fees imported as ledger lines. Margins reflect take-home automatically.
• Modern auth. Social login and magic links, with MFA under consideration.

The five-question decision

The reduction.

• Want to start on a free plan rather than a 7-day trial? → Ardent Seller (Inventora no longer has a free tier).
• Catalog over 500 materials or variants, or planning to grow there in year one? → Ardent Seller (no material cap).
• Selling food, soap, cosmetics, herbal products, or anything labeled? → Ardent Seller (compliance features Inventora does not match).
• Tracking depreciable equipment — kiln, roaster, mixer, printer, CNC? → Ardent Seller (equipment depreciation Inventora does not contest).
• Want AI invoice import on the free tier, with each line matched to inventory? → Ardent Seller (Inventora has no free plan to use it on). Already relying on Inventora's more established scanner day to day? No need to switch for this alone.
• Three or more native marketplace integrations live today, no CSV-bridge tolerance? → Inventora, today. Revisit when Ardent Seller's Shopify connector ships.
• Already evaluated, already comfortable on Inventora, already getting value? → Stay on Inventora. This is not the most important decision the seller will make this quarter.

The honest reduction: most makers who land on this comparison would benefit from opening an Ardent Seller free account, importing a representative sample of recipes and inventory, and running one production batch through both tools side by side. The free tier is built to support that kind of side-by-side without time pressure. A decision made with a real sample of real data is more reliable than a decision made from a feature table — even a good one.

Start a free Ardent Seller account, import a recipe, and find out whether it covers the work that actually pays the bills. If it does not, the alternative is one click away.

Related reading

• Craftybase vs. Ardent Seller for Makers — The other major head-to-head in this space; useful if Inventora and Ardent Seller are not the only two tools in the running.
• Best Inventory App for Etsy Sellers in 2026 — The broader buyer's guide covering five tools across the same price range; useful for a wider field-of-five evaluation.
• Recipe Costing 101 — The foundational primer on the five cost buckets every recipe-based maker should be tracking, regardless of which tool runs the math.

Free resources

A few free downloads from the Ardent Workshop library that pair well with this comparison:

• Spreadsheet vs Inventory Software: The Decision Guide — A printable decision framework for sellers still on a spreadsheet who want to decide whether to move to a dedicated tool at all before picking between specific products.
• Inventory Tracker Starter Kit — A clean baseline structure for tracking raw materials, recipes, and finished goods that maps neatly onto either Inventora or Ardent Seller during an evaluation.
• Product Pricing Calculator — A free pricing worksheet that surfaces the cost stack underneath a finished product, useful for cross-checking the recipe costs either inventory tool generates.

---

This article is provided for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal, financial, regulatory, or tax advice. Pricing, feature availability, and tier structures for Inventora and Ardent Seller are described as of the September 2026 review date and may change — verify current information on each vendor's site before deciding. Inventora is a trademark of its respective owner; Ardent Workshop is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Inventora. Consult a qualified accountant or small-business advisor before making financial or compliance decisions based on this content.